The comparative effects of ventilation shutdown with heat (VSDH), relative humidity (VSDHRh), or CO2 (VSDCO2) on broiler electroencephalogram (EEG), blood chemistry and gene expression

382

Summary

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreaks have highlighted major needs for multiple effective depopulation methods across all sectors and housing systems in the commercial poultry industry. Ventilation shutdown plus heat (VSDH), heat and relative humidity (VSDHRh), and carbon dioxide (VSDCO2) were analyzed to understand how these methods affect broiler stress parameters and behavior. Two phases were used with both phases being conducted in sealable Plexiglass® chambers. Phase 1 (P1) analyzed electroencephalogram (EEG) of each broiler in each treatment along with blood chemistry, corticosterone, and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) at time of death (TOD). Phase 2 (P2) looked at the progression of the stress parameters over time with specific physiological points when birds were removed from their respective chamber. There was a significant difference (P<0.0001) between time of death (TOD) with VSDCO2 being significantly faster at 21.25 minutes compared to VSDH and VSDHRh at 63.75 and 58.25, respectively, in P1. However, there were no significant differences in the TOD between VSDH or VSDHRh. There was also a significant increase in chamber ending CO2, for VSDCO2 compared to VSDH and VSDHRh. However, both VSDH and VSDHRh broilers had significantly greater (P<0.0001) post core body temperatures indicating hyperthermia being the mode of action rather than hypoxia which is the mode of action in VSDCO2. The HSP70 levels were significantly greater in VSDH at 1.23 CT-1 compared to both VSDHRh at 0.98 CT-1 and VSDCO2 at 0.90 CT-1, which were not significantly different from each other. Blood chemistry parameters that were significantly higher in VSDCO2 treatment broilers when compared to VSDHRh were total CO2 (TCO2), partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), Bicarbonate (HCO3), and blood oxygen saturation (sO2). When compared to VSDH, TCO2, pCO2, and sO2 levels were significantly greater in broilers undergoing the VSDCO2 treatment. There were also no significant differences in corticosterone between treatments in P1 with corticosterone levels for VSDH being 0.11 ng/mL, 0.10 ng/mL for VSDHRh, and 0.12 ng/mL for VSDCO2. When analyzing the effects of these treatments on broilers over time in P2, there were no significant differences in corticosterone, blood chemistry, or HSP70 when compared within their respective treatments. Based on this research, VSDHRh may be an effective and useful depopulation method that may be used in the event of an outbreak. This is due to the equivalency of TOD in comparison to VSDH, with potential reduction in HSP70 levels. More research should be conducted on the effects of VSDHRh, especially in a non-environmentally controlled setting.

Description of problem

The poultry industry experienced massive losses in 2015 and 2022 due to large Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreaks. Overall, since 2022, 96 million birds, including egg-laying birds, turkeys, and more than 6 million broilers, were lost in these outbreaks (USDA-APHIS, 2024). While the broiler industry did experience some losses during these outbreaks, it was not to the magnitude of the others. In 2015, on average less than 0.01 % of the United States broiler flocks were affected (USDA-APHIS, 2016: USDA-ERS, 2017). During the 2022 outbreak, over 5 million broilers were lost due to HPAI (USDA-APHIS, 2024). Potentially the reason broilers were not greatly affected by HPAI in either major outbreak when compared to others is due to regionality (USDA-ERS, 2022). However, the broiler industry was heavily affected by the 2020 COVID-19 outbreak. This outbreak resulted in mass shutdown of sit-down and fast-food restaurants, along with labor shortages nationwide (Sharma et al., 2020). This led to a drop in demand for chicken products, leading to the need for rapid depopulation. Other processing plants were forced to shut down due to labor shortages caused by COVID-19 need for disinfection for worker safety (Marchant-Forde and Boyle, 2020). This resulted in depopulation of roughly two million broilers (Kevany, 2020). The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) defines depopulation as “the rapid destruction of a large number of animals in response to urgent circumstances” (AVMA, 2019). Currently, the AVMA has approved different methods for depopulation such as water-based foam, CO2 carts, and other alternative methods like ventilation shutdown plus (VSD+) (AVMA, 2019). During large outbreaks of diseases, supplies like CO2 become limited, resulting in a need for use of alternative methods. Any use of VSD+ must be approved by the Veterinary Medical Officers in charge of the outbreak. While ventilation shutdown plus heat (VSDH) and ventilation shutdown plus CO2 (VSDCO2) are approved, there is still a need for quicker, less-stressful methods. A previous research study analyzed the addition of steam as a ventilation shutdown plus method in laying hens. The results showed the addition of steam with heat resulted in significantly faster first hen mortality and complete mortality compared to ventilation shutdown plus heat by itself (Mendoza et al., 2024). Potentially, adding relative humidity may result in a reduction in time to death. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of adding relative humidity to ventilation shutdown (VSDHRh). Parameters evaluated included broiler time of death, electroencephalograms (EEGs), blood chemistry, corticosterone, and gene expression.

Materials and methods

All animal research procedures used in these trials were approved by the North Carolina State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC #21-310). This study was conducted in the Scott Hall bird wing at the Prestage Department of Poultry Science. Veterinarians and animal welfare specialists employed by the university monitored the birds throughout the process.
This study consisted of two phases, Phase 1 (P1) and Phase 2 (P2), with both occurring in a total of four, 4.75 ft3 chambers made with Plexiglass®. The Plexiglass® was 0.25 in thick on each side, with three sides having 1-inch thick, closed cell foil backed insulation foam boards to prevent chamber heat loss. The front side was not covered which allowed for observations. The chambers were built to allow for attachments to collect data, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) for measuring and injection of the gas, and attachments for relative humidity and temperature sensors. Each chamber was vented through a rigid barbed hose fitting (Grainger, Lake Forest, IL, USA; Model: 707020-0404) located on the top, back-right corner of each chamber. The venting allowed air to exit the box during the VSDCO2 treatment as CO2 was injected. Each chamber was equipped with a 100-watt incandescent light bulb. This provided a heat source for treatments with heat, or additional heat, as described in Table 1, but the light was not turned on for VSDCO2 as to not provide additional heat. The chambers were located in a temperature-controlled, windowless room that was kept around 26°C±5 (78°F) to prevent heat loss to the environment. The door to the room was closed for the VSDH and VSDHRh treatments, but for human safety, the door was left open for VSDCO2. P1 and P2 had three treatments that were evaluated which were ventilation shutdown plus heat (VSDH), ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity (VSDHRh), and ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide (VSDCO2). For P1, the CO2 was injected into the chambers at 1 % CO2 per minute to try and achieve ∼30 % CO2 to correlate what would be seen in an industry setting.

Table 1. Definition and description of the treatments in the study.

Treatment Description
Ventilation Shutdown plus Heat (VSDH) Ventilation is shut off and all inlets and exhausts are sealed and heat is supplemented
Ventilation Shutdown plus Heat and Relative Humidity (VSDHRh) Ventilation is shut off and all inlets and exhausts are sealed and heat and humidity is supplemented with a target of ∼99 %
Ventilation Shutdown plus Carbon dioxide (VSDCO2) Ventilation is shut off, all inlets and exhausts are sealed and Carbon dioxide (CO2) is supplemented to ∼30 %
Twelve, 42-day-old mixed sex broilers were used for P1, allowing for four replicates per treatment. Broilers used in P1 and P2 were raised at the Poultry Teaching Unit in the Prestage Department of Poultry Science and birds were randomly selected for each treatment. These birds were fed a standard broiler diet and were raised in floor pens. Treatment broilers were transported to the bird wing in Prestage Department of Poultry Science 1 day before the study began and were provided broiler finisher feed and water ad libitum. Treatment broilers were removed and blood was collected from the brachial vein and placed in 3 mL BD Vacutainer tubes with lithium heparin to prevent clotting. This allowed for a baseline analysis of corticosterone levels and blood chemistry prior to treatment. For blood chemistry, roughly 0.1 mL of heparinized blood was placed on the i-STAT® diagnostic system using the CG8+ cartridges (Abbott Park, IL, USA; Model: 03P8825) to be analyzed. The remaining blood in the tube was placed on a gentle rocker to be centrifuged later. After centrifugation, the plasma was poured off and frozen at 20°C for corticosterone analysis. Pre- and post-core body temperatures were collected before and after treatments for P1 and P2 using a SuperMeter® cloacal temperature probe (Stamford, CT, USA; Model: HHM290). Throughout P1, an electroencephalogram (EEG) was used to measure each bird’s brain electrical output in millivolts (mV). Before the EEG electrode placement, each bird was hobbled which allowed them to stand and move but prevented them from scratching their head resulting in the potential removal of the electrodes. The hobble, a rubber band, was put on the shanks and above the dewclaws. All electrodes were insulated, except for the tips that were 32-gauge needles. There was a total of three electrode colors: green, black, and red. The green electrode was the ground and was placed in between the waddles on the lower mandible. The red and black wires were placed on either side of the cranium, above the ear lobe and behind the comb. Once inserted, each electrode was secured using surgical adhesive and by means of the catheter taping method. Thereafter, these three leads were taped together and wrapped under the joint of the wing that provided an additional method to reduce the likelihood of the bird pulling out the inserted probes. Once the probes were secured, the birds were placed in their respective chambers, which were then sealed. The terminal end of the EEG electrodes were plugged into a pre-amplifier (AD Instruments, Colorado Springs, CO, USA), transferring the EEG readings to a laptop that was continuously monitored. All EEG data was recorded at 10-50 Hertz (Hz) and sampled at 100 Hz/channel and was recorded until time of death (TOD) was called by the veterinarian. Time of death for all birds in P1 and P2 was determined by cessation of movement as described in Table 2. Broiler behavior in P1 was observed and recorded in real time by a trained person and recorded at 2-minute intervals, with behaviors (described in Table 2) being evaluated based on observations by Krish (2018). The unconscious behaviors were determined after the broiler EEG readings dropped below 0.01 mV. Temperature and relative humidity of each chamber and each phase was recorded every minute with sensors (Aranet, Riga, Latvia; Model: SKU: TDSPT8U2; Accuracy: ±0.3°C and ±2 %) that were placed roughly 4 cm from the top of the inside of each chamber. Carbon dioxide was measured using two 0-100 % CO2 monitors (CO2Meter, Inc., Ormond Beach, FL; Model: CM-0003; Accuracy: ±70 ppm ± 5 %) and recorded every minute. Each chamber was equipped with a rigid barbed hose fitting (Grainger, Lake Forest, IL, USA; Model: 707020-0404) for a ¼-in inside diameter (ID) wide tube to be snugly fit over the fitting. The other end of the tube was attached to the CO2 monitor. For VSDHRh, a fogger (AUAAQ, Seattle, WA, USA; Model: KLS-208) was utilized and turned on once start time was initiated and turned off when the Aranet sensors read 99 % relative humidity. The average flow rate of the fogger was 0.27 L/min. A 1-in diameter hole on the left side of each chamber allowed for the plastic tubing to be securely attached to the chamber with the other end being attached to the fogger. This hole was plugged for VSDH and VSDCO2 treatments. To inject CO2, each chamber was equipped with an attached ¼-in 250 pounds per square inch (PSI) air hose on the bottom right side. These hoses have a ¼-in body and hose fitting size with a PARKER Quick Connect Hose Coupling push-to-connect female attachment (Grainger, Lake Forest, IL, USA; Model: B33) at the end. An 11-gallon portable air tank (Torin Big Red Jacks, Ontario, CA, USA; Model: T88011), with a 125-PSI max, and equipped with a regulator, was charged with CO2 from a tank to allow for easier control of flow and temper the CO2 temperature. The portable air tank was also equipped with a ¼-in 250 pounds per square inch (PSI) hose with a ¼-in body and hose fitting size, PARKER Quick Connect Hose Coupling push-to-connect male attachment (Grainger, Lake Forest, IL, USA; Model: B32) allowing for attachment to the chamber. Each tank was equipped with an on/off ball valve with a lever attached to regulate the CO2 flow into the chamber. The CO2 was tempered to room temperature for P1 and P2. For P1, the CO2 was injected into the chambers at 1 % CO2 per minute and was verified by the CO2 meter readings with a goal to achieve ∼30 % CO2 to correlate what would be seen in an industry setting. Once TOD for a bird was called, the bird was removed, body temperature was measured, and blood was collected from the body cavity immediately. The blood was removed using a syringe and this method was used due to the immediate blood clotting issues observed, especially in VSDH and VSDHRh. The blood was then placed in a labeled BD Vacutainer tubes with lithium heparin and blood gas was evaluated again for post levels utilizing the same procedures as above for the i-STAT® diagnostic system using CG8+ cartridges and future corticosterone analysis. Birds were also necropsied to remove the brain which was placed in RNAlater® solution in a 25 mL conical tube. This tube was then placed in a refrigerator (4°C) for 24 hours and then moved to a freezer (-20°C) for later RNA extraction and analysis.

Table 2. Description of observed behaviors and analyzed reported every two-minutes in P11.

Behaviors Description
Conscious
Headshake Rapid shaking or lateral movement of the head
Mandibulation/Panting Repetitive tasting movement with bill and Deeper than normal expiration through open mouth.
Standing Partially flexed hip, knee, and jock joints.
Wing Flapping A bout of continuous, rapid wing flapping
Crouch Leg joints are flexed maximally
Jump Spring from the floor with propulsive force derived from the leg.
Unconscious (<0.01 mV EEG)
Respiratory Disruption/Gaping Deep, open bill with prolonged open bill gaping, or both, combined with apparent inhalation attempts.
Loss of Posture Loss of balance or posture, or both (lateral recumbency)
Cessation of Movement Exclusion of any bird movement due to loss of posture, respiration, mouth gaping, specific colonic and tonic convulsions, stiffening, and feather trembling. This was the determination of bird death.
1
Behaviors adapted from Krish, 2018.
In P2 of this experiment, we aimed to determine the physiological aspects of the three treatments over time by examining the corticosterone, gene expression, and blood chemistry. Ten 42-day-old mixed sex broilers were used for each treatment allowing for two replications for each time point. To determine removal times in order to understand the changes over time, the four TOD from each treatment in P1 were averaged. The average was then quartered giving four removal times, with a total of five including the baseline. The calculated time points for this experiment are listed in Table 3. The flow rate of CO2 for VSDCO2 treatment was calculated similarly to the removal times with the final CO2 for VSDCO2 treatment only being summed up and quartered to determine the flow rate over time for this treatment. The flow rate of CO2 for the VSDCO2 treatment was 4 % CO2 every five minutes. At time of removal, all birds were bled via the brachial vein and methods described above were followed for i-STAT® diagnostic system using CG8+ cartridges and corticosterone analysis. Broilers were then euthanized by a trained individual via cervical dislocation and necropsied with the brain tissue being collected and placed in RNAlater® solution following procedures described above.

Table 3. Calculated removal time in minutes for Phase 2 for each treatment. Sequence is Baseline = 0, 25 is 25 % to TOD, 50 is 50 % to TOD, 75 is 75 % to TOD, and 100 % is TOD.

Empty Cell 0 25 50 75 100
Treatment1 Minutes
VSDH 16 32 48 64
VSDHRh 15 30 45 60
VSDCO2 5 10 15 20
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.
An ELISA corticosterone kit (Cayman Chemical Company, Item: 501320, Ann Arbor MI, USA) was used to analyze corticosterone concentration levels in P1 and P2 following manufacturer guidelines. The concentration levels were evaluated using a standard curve of nanograms of corticosterone per milliliter of plasma. A 1-cm portion of brain tissues from P1 and P2 was cut and removed to isolate RNA. These pieces were placed into individually labeled screw cap homogenization vials and then 1 mL of TRI Reagent™ Solution. Each sample was homogenized using a bead-beater for 20 seconds and then incubated at room temperature for five minutes. Thereafter, 200 µL of chloroform was added to each sample and vortexed for a few seconds then left at room temperature for two minutes. These samples were then centrifuged at 13,000xg for 20 minutes. Afterwards, the RNA isolation was completed using an RNeasy kit (QIAGEN, Hilden Germany) following the manufacturer guidelines. A NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific-Waltham, MA) was used to quantify the RNA levels and ensure the correct RNA dilution. The RNA was taken and transcribed into cDNA for quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) using a high-capacity synthesis kit (Applied Biosystems Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). All qPCR was completed on each sample in triplicate. In each of the wells there was 2.5 ng of samples, 500 nM of gene specific forward and reverse primers (Table 4), and 2X power SYBR green master mix (Applied Biosystems Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and H2O was added to a finalize the volume to 20 µL. The Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus real-time PCR system was used to perform qPCR. The results were then normalized to Beta Actin expression, a basic housekeeping gene. For ease of interpretation, the reciprocal was then taken using the formula: 1/(target gene cycle threshold/beta actin cycle threshold). All data presented as reciprocal cycle thresholds of CT-1.

Table 4. Genes and their genetic sequences (forward and reverse) utilized for gene expression.

Gene Primer Directional Sequence Sequence
Beta Actin b-Actin Forward GTCCACCTTCCAGCAGATGT
Reverse ATAAAGCCATGCCAATCTCG
Heat Shock Protein HSP70 Forward GCGGAGCGAGTGGCTGACTG
Reverse CGGTTCCCCTGGTCGTTGGC

Statistical analysis

To determine the differences among treatments in both P1 and P2, a one-way ANOVA was used with α≤0.05 and if there were any differences observed, a Tukey’s HSD was utilized to make comparisons. The EEG data was transformed by taking the absolute value of the integral of all EEG readings to mitigate variability, using the following equation:
The hyperbolic arcsin function was used on each value to emphasize the lower mV readings. The transformed EEG data was analyzed with a GLM with full factorial effects. These factorial effects are VSDH, VSDHRh, and VSDCO2 fit to each response variable. The transformed EEG analysis used the integral under the curve, calculated with the Trapezoid method, and analyzed using an NPARM analysis. The behaviors that broilers performed in P1 were summarized in terms of frequency and were labeled as conscious (voluntary) or unconscious (involuntary). Then, the summarized EEG brain activity over the same time intervals was overlaid with the observed behavioral frequencies, and a correlation analysis examining the relationship between VSDH, VSDHRh, and VSDCO2 was run. EEG activity, as well as conscious and unconscious behaviors, were analyzed using Pearson Linear Correlation Analysis in SAS JMP-PRO® 12.2.0 (SAS Instititute, 1989).

Results and discussion

Phase 1

There were no significant differences in broiler body weight between treatments as shown in Table 5. Table 5 also shows there was a significant difference in start chamber temperature (P<0.0001) with the VSDCO2 treatment having lower temperatures. This difference could be due to the fact that, although the room was kept at 26°C ± 5 (78°F), both the VSDH and VSDHRh treatments had the door shut to reduce airflow, whereas the VSDCO2 treatment had the door open for human safety concerns. The ending chamber temperature was still significantly lower (P=0.0029) in the VSDCO2 at 27.84°C due to the other two treatments using supplemental heat but not in the VSDCO2 treatment. It could also be caused by the cooling effects from the injection of CO2 for the VSDCO2 treatment. The starting chamber relative humidity percentages for VSDH (35.05 % Rh) and VSDHRh (33.08 % Rh) were significantly lower than that of VSDCO2 at 43.43 % (P=0.0017), however the ending chamber relative humidity percentage for VSDCO2 at 65.25 % was significantly lower (P=0.0005) than the other treatments with VSDH at 85.55 % Rh and 82.70 % Rh. This could be attributed to the added relative humidity in the VSDHRh treatment along with the respiratory moisture from the birds in the chamber. The significant difference in starting relative humidity is likely due to the higher room temperature, which reduced the relative humidity. Additionally, the longer time to TOD for both VSDH and VSDHRh allowed for moisture accumulation over time. The starting CO2 levels were not significantly different for any treatment, but the ending levels were significantly greater (P<0.0001) with 16.85 % CO2 for the VSDCO2 treatment due to the addition of CO2 into that treatment only. The ending CO2 for VSDH was 2.40 % and was 1.89 % for VSDHRh. Table 6 depicts the time of death (TOD) in minutes, as well as the pre and post core body temperature for each treatment. There were no significant differences in the pre-core body temperatures of the broilers, however the post-core body temperatures were significantly lower (P<0.0001) in the VSDCO2 treatment at 41.80°C compared VSDH at 45.55°C and VSDHRh at 45.75°C. This was due to the lack of additional heat in this treatment compared to VSDH and VSDHRh. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in TOD between VSDH and VSDHRh, however VSDCO2 TOD was significantly lower (P<0.0001) than the other treatments which was to be expected due to previous research findings (Eberle-Krish et al., 2018). The VSDH nearly tripled the amount of time in the Plexiglass® chamber until TOD was determined with the TODs values at 21.25, 63.75, and 58.25 minutes for VSDCO2, VSDH, and VSDHRh treatments, respectively.

Table 5. Broiler bodyweight and start and end temperature, relative humidity, and CO2 levels during P1 for each treatment.

Treatment1 Broiler Body Weight (kg) Start Chamber Temperature (°C) Start Chamber Relative Humidity ( %) Start CO2 ( %) End Chamber Temperature (°C) End Chamber Relative Humidity ( %) End CO2 ( %)
VSDH 2.39 29.58a 35.05b 0.31 38.81a 85.55a 2.40b
VSDHRh 2.41 30.00a 33.08b 0.34 41.78a 82.70a 1.89b
VSDCO2 2.36 26.39b 43.43a 0.28 27.84b 65.25b 16.85a
SEM 0.15 0.12 1.47 0.09 2.12 2.43 1.08
P-value 0.9734 <0.0001 0.0017 0.8745 0.0029 0.0005 <0.0001
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.

Table 6. Broiler time of death and pre and post core body temperatures for each treatment.

Treatment1 Core Body Temperature (°C) TOD (minutes)
Empty Cell Pre Post Empty Cell
VSDH 38.93 45.55a 63.75a
VSDHRh 38.52 45.75a 58.25a
VSDCO2 39.70 41.80b 21.25b
SEM 1.15 0.39 3.71
P-value 0.7671 <0.0001 <0.0001
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.
Results from the composite electroencephalographic (EEG) for the three treatments are shown in Fig. 1. From these results, the broilers did not become unconscious in the later stages of any of the methods. Potentially not seeing the unconscious levels at the end of the EEGs and rather spikes could be due to the agonal movements that were occurring right before TOD. These movements can still cause EEG recordings even though these are involuntary behaviors leading the body to present convulsive movements due to residual neural activity or brainstem reflexes (Grist et al., 2018). Fig. 2 depicts the integral area under the electroencephalographic (EEG) composite graph for VSDH, VSDHRh, and VSDCO2 to time of death using the trapezoid method. The area under the graph of these transformed EEGs was not different amongst the three treatments. This was unexpected because the time of death for the VSDCO2 treatment was significantly shorter, although the mV strength was more pronounced. These results could be because the brainwave activity was relatively high throughout the process for all the methods. Fig. 3 depicts the frequency of voluntary and involuntary behavioral responses from beginning to time of death.
Fig 1

  1. Download: Download high-res image (365KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 1. Composite electroencephalogram (EEG) graphs of broilers close to time of death (TOD) in chambers during P1 for the three treatments. VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.

Fig 2

  1. Download: Download high-res image (127KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 2. Integrated area under the EEG graph calculated from the transformed composite EEGs for VSDH, VSDHRh, and VSDCO2 through TOD using the trapezoidal method. VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.

Fig 3

  1. Download: Download high-res image (392KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Fig. 3. Frequency of voluntary and involuntary behavioral responses of broilers undergoing VSDH, VSDHRh, and VSDCO2 through to time of death in correlation with EEG signals. VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.

There were no significant differences between the behaviors of the birds undergoing their respective treatments and the strength of the EEGs as shown in Table 7. This indicates that, even though the EEGs in Fig. 1 show different patterns of mV strength, the integral area under the graphs in Fig. 2 supports no significant differences in percentages within the mV strengths between the methods. The behaviors observed in all three methods were consistent with behaviors described by Webster and Fletcher (2001). There were shifts in conscious and unconscious behavior observations shown in Fig. 3. This shift from conscious to unconscious behavior midway through the depopulation method was consistent except with the VSDCO2 method where there was a combination of conscious and unconscious behaviors in the latter half of the method. The shift in behaviors throughout the course of both the VSDH and VSDHRh appears to correspond with Wang et al. (2014), where neuron function declines in hyperthermic conditions when core body temperatures exceed normal range. This was not the case with VSDCO2 where EEGs and conscious behavior persisted for the duration until TOD. The conscious behaviors that were recorded at this time were head shaking and wing flapping. Table 8 illustrates that EEG wave strength and hen behaviors are poorly correlated.

Table 7. Strength of EEG waves for each treatment group.

Treatment1 Percent EEG time within each mV range
Empty Cell 0-0.01 mV ( %) 0.01-0.03 mV ( %) 0.03-0.05 mV ( %) >0.05 mV ( %)
VSDH 73.28 16.14 4.18 6.41
VSDHRh 84.11 7.08 3.18 5.64
VSDCO2 84.11 8.27 2.03 5.59
SEM 12.69 6.00 2.28 4.68
P-value 0.7894 0.5340 0.8056 0.9905
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.

Table 8. Pearson Linear Correlation Coefficients associated with Behavior Observations as they relate to the electroencephalogram (EEG) waves.

Treatment1 Conscious2 Confidence Interval Empty Cell Behaviors
Empty Cell >0.01 mV Lower 95 % Upper 95 % PValue N=
VSDH 0.005 -0.162 0.172 0.9505 138
VSDHRh -0.138 -0.308 0.040 0.1268 123
VSDCO2 0.006 -0.282 0.293 0.9680 47
Treatment Unconscious3 Confidence Interval Empty Cell Behaviors
Empty Cell <0.01 mV Lower 95 % Upper 95 % PValue N=
VSDH 0.038 -0.130 0.204 0.6578 138
VSDHRh 0.117 -0.012 0.288 0.1982 123
VSDCO2 -0.006 -0.293 0.282 0.9676 47
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.
2
Conscious behavior were defined as voluntary behaviors.
3
Unconscious behaviors were defined as involuntary and were determined when the EEG readings dropped below 0.01 mV.
Broiler blood chemistry from P1 is shown in Table 9. There were significant increases in total CO2 (TCO2), partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), partial pressure of oxygen (pO2), bicarbonate (HCO3), and blood oxygen saturation (sO2) in VSDCO2 compared to VSDHRh. The TCO2, pCO2, and sO2 levels in the birds in the VSDCO2 treatment were also higher than those birds subjected to the VSDH treatment. These higher levels are likely due to the addition of CO2 in the VSDCO2 treatment, which increased CO2 levels in the blood and elevated oxygen and bicarbonate levels to mitigate the major changes occurring because of the CO2 levels (Stepanek et al., 2020). There was also a significant increase in sodium (Na) in the VSDHRh at 150 mmol/L treatment compared to VSDH and VSDCO2 that both have Na levels of 139.5 mmol/L. This could be due to dehydration from increased water loss associated with respiration, which leads to reduced blood volume and increased sodium levels. This can also be a result of the impairment of kidney function reducing the ability to excrete sodium resulting in an accumulation in the blood due to the body’s inability to dissipate the heat effectively (Berglund, 1998; Finco, 1997).

Table 9. Comparison of blood chemistry of broiler chickens depopulated using VSDH (Hyperthermic method), VSDHRh and VSDCO2 from P1.

Treatment1 VSDH VSDHRh VSDCO2 SEM P-value
pH 6.94 7.08 7.05 0.03 0.1716
pCO2 (mmHg) 66.85b 59.08b 92.43a 6.35 0.04
pO2 (mmHg) 47.00b 42.50b 70.50a 5.67 0.02
BEecf2(mmol/L) -18.00b -14.75b -5.75a 1.79 0.0015
HCO3 (mmol/L) 14.28b 15.38b 24.93a 1.54 <0.0001
TCO23 (mmol/L) 16.25b 16.75b 28.00a 1.71 <0.0001
sO24 ( %) 55.25b 58.25ab 79.00a 4.38 0.0343
Na (mmol/L) 139.50b 150.00a 139.50b 2.18 0.0469
K (mmol/L) 9.00 9.00 8.80 0.07 0.4053
iCa5 (mmol/L) 1.24b 1.22b 1.81a 0.08 <0.0001
Glucose (mg/dL) 338.50 300.00 275.75 22.87 0.5741
Hct6 ( % PCV) 20.25 20.75 17.00 0.96 0.2354
Hb7 (g/dL) 6.88 7.05 5.80 0.35 0.3642
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.
2
BEecf= base excess in the extracellular fluid.
3
TCO2=total Carbon dioxide.
4
sO2=blood oxygen saturation.
5
iCa=ionized calcium.
6
Hct=hematocrit.
7
Hb=Hemoglobin
There were also significant increases in the ionized calcium (iCa) at 1.81 mmol/L and base excess in the extracellular fluid (BEecf) at -5.75 mmol/L in the VSDCO2 treatment compared to the others (Table 9). This could be due to the birds passing from respiratory acidosis, with calcium acting as a buffering system. The BEecf levels are high as well due to increased buffers, such as iCa and HCO3, which help reduce blood acidity. There were no significant differences in the corticosterone levels between treatments for P1 broilers as shown in Table 10. These results agree with those reported by Kang and Shim (2021) when analyzing broilers under acute stress. Other reports of heat stress in broiler chickens also found no significant differences in corticosterone in broilers exposed to heat stress at 32°C±1 for ten hours and then returned to the control temperature of 24°C±1 (Sun et al., 2015). Table 10 also depicts the heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) levels in broilers undergoing each treatment. The HSP70 levels were significantly higher (P=0.0014) in VSDH at 1.23 CT-1 compared to VSDHRh at 0.98 CT-1 and VSDCO2 at 0.90 CT-1 which could be due to the heat alone leading to more upregulation of HSP70 compared to the VSDHRh in which potentially the relative humidity could have affected the upregulation of the gene. It also could be due to the VSDH having a longer TOD. Although the difference was not significant, the extra duration may have contributed to greater upregulation of the HSP70 gene.

Table 10. Effects of VSDH, VSDHRh, and VSDCO2 on broiler chicken corticosterone and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) levels.

Treatment1 VSDH VSDHRh VSDCO2 SEM P-value
Corticosterone (ng/mL) 0.11 0.10 0.12 0.002 0.07
HSP70 (CT1) 1.23a 0.98b 0.90b 0.06 0.0014
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat; VSDHRh = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity; VSDCO2 = ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.

Phase 2

There were no significant differences in blood chemistry among treatments, as shown in Tables 11, 12, and 13. When analyzing corticosterone over time at the time removals described in Table 3, there were no significant differences. These times were only compared within treatments, not across treatments and are shown in Table 14. No significant differences were observed in the HSP70 levels in the broilers over time for either treatment, which are also depicted in Table 14. However, there was a trend (P=0.06) in the VSDH treatment toward significance, so potentially, with a larger sample size for each time point there might have been a significant treatment effect. There was an increase in HSP70 levels at the end even though it was not significant.

Table 11. P2 blood chemistry of broiler chickens depopulated using VSDH (Hyperthermic method) using the TOD from P1 to evaluate changes.

Treatment VSDH1 SEM P-value
Sequence2 0 25 50 75 100
pH 7.42 7.55 7.46 7.55 7.46 0.04 0.23
pCO2 (mmHg) 41.35 34.95 37.90 34.55 38.40 4.85 0.85
pO2 (mmHg) 66.50 53.00 59.50 63.50 46.00 13.04 0.80
Beecf3 (mmol/L) 2.00 7.50 3.50 3.00 0.50 2.44 0.43
HCO3 (mmol/L) 26.80 30.10 27.10 24.20 26.60 2.35 0.58
TCO24 (mmol/L) 28.00 31.00 28.00 27.50 26.00 2.54 0.73
sO25 ( %) 91.00 90.50 93.50 84.50 82.50 6.07 0.68
Na (mmol/L) 140.50 140.00 142.50 153.00 141.00 5.94 0.55
K (mmol/L) 4.95 4.80 5.15 4.80 6.05 0.84 0.81
iCa6 (mmol/L) 1.96 2.22 2.16 1.52 1.45 0.36 0.49
Glucose (mg/dL) 218.00 221.50 224.00 228.00 228.00 11.57 0.96
Hct7 ( % PCV) 23.00 25.50 25.00 25.50 24.00 2.95 0.96
Hb8 (g/dL) 7.85 8.65 8.50 8.20 7.80 1.00 0.96
P2=Phase 2, which was used to determine the physiological aspects of the three treatments over time by examining the corticosterone, gene expression, and blood chemistry.
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat.
2
Sequence is Baseline = 0, 25 is 25 % to TOD, 50 is 50 % to TOD, 75 is 75 % to TOD, and 100 is TOD.
3
BEecf= base excess in the extracellular fluid.
4
TCO2=total Carbon dioxide.
5
sO2=blood oxygen saturation.
6
iCa=ionized calcium.
7
Hct=hematocrit.
8
Hb=Hemoglobin

Table 12. P2 blood chemistry of broiler chickens depopulated using VSDHRh (Hyperthermic method) using the TOD from P1 to evaluate changes.

Treatment VSDHRh1 SEM P-value
Sequence2 0 25 50 75 100
pH 7.41 7.54 7.55 7.58 7.47 0.05 0.24
pCO2 (mmHg) 45.25 34.45 31.90 29.70 32.90 4.09 0.20
pO2 (mmHg) 54.50 37.50 51.50 48.50 42.50 8.82 0.68
Beecf3 (mmol/L) 4.00 7.50 5.50 6.00 0.00 2.66 0.43
HCO3 (mmol/L) 28.70 29.65 27.75 27.65 23.60 2.16 0.43
TCO24 (mmol/L) 30.00 30.50 29.00 28.50 24.50 2.40 0.49
sO25( %) 82.00 78.50 90.50 90.00 81.50 5.32 0.47
Na (mmol/L) 148.50 151.00 155.50 147.50 149.00 3.09 0.46
K (mmol/L) 5.80 5.35 5.70 5.55 5.75 0.48 0.95
iCa6 (mmol/L) 1.43 1.42 1.50 1.52 1.36 0.19 0.97
Glucose (mg/dL) 232.00 221.50 237.50 251.00 234.00 8.34 0.30
Hct7 ( % PCV) 22.00 21.00 21.00 19.50 23.00 1.43 0.56
Hb8 (g/dL) 7.50 7.15 7.15 6.65 7.85 0.49 0.55
P2=Phase 2, which was used to determine the physiological aspects of the three treatments over time by examining the corticosterone, gene expression, and blood chemistry.
1
VSDRhH = ventilation shutdown plus heat and relative humidity.
2
Sequence is Baseline = 0, 25 is 25 % to TOD, 50 is 50 % to TOD, 75 is 75 % to TOD, and 100 is TOD.
3
BEecf= base excess in the extracellular fluid.
4
TCO2=total Carbon dioxide.
5
sO2=blood oxygen saturation.
6
iCa=ionized calcium.
7
Hct=hematocrit.
8
Hb=Hemoglobin

Table 13. P2 blood chemistry of broiler chickens depopulated using VSDHCO2 (Hyperthermic method) using the TOD from P1 to evaluate changes.

Treatment VSDCO21 SEM P-value
Sequence2 0 25 50 75 100
pH 7.38 7.28 7.28 7.23 7.27 0.05 0.39
pCO2 (mmHg) 47.90 61.80 54.70 66.30 61.70 8.47 0.61
pO2 (mmHg) 42.50 57.50 54.00 58.00 54.00 7.87 0.66
Beecf3 (mmol/L) 3.50 2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.50 3.05 0.85
HCO3 (mmol/L) 28.55 28.75 25.65 27.45 28.55 2.73 0.91
TCO24 (mmol/L) 30.00 31.00 27.50 29.50 30.50 2.89 0.92
sO25 ( %) 76.50 84.0 81.00 83.00 81.50 4.53 0.80
Na (mmol/L) 154.50 145.50 146.00 153.50 143.00 4.31 0.35
K (mmol/L) 6.00 6.60 6.60 5.80 6.15 0.32 0.39
iCa6 (mmol/L) 1.51 1.39 1.52 1.66 1.81 0.18 0.56
Glucose (mg/dL) 219.00 246.50 239.00 243.50 259.00 19.21 0.69
Hct7 ( % PCV) 22.50 22.50 24.50 22.50 24.00 3.03 0.98
Hb8 (g/dL) 7.65 8.15 8.35 7.65 8.20 1.07 0.98
P2=Phase 2, which was used to determine the physiological aspects of the three treatments over time by examining the corticosterone, gene expression, and blood chemistry.
1
VSDCO2= ventilation shutdown plus carbon dioxide.
2
Sequence is Baseline = 0, 25 is 25 % to TOD, 50 is 50 % to TOD, 75 is 75 % to TOD, and 100 is TOD.
3
BEecf= base excess in the extracellular fluid.
4
TCO2=total Carbon dioxide.
5
sO2=blood oxygen saturation.
6
iCa=ionized calcium.
7
Hct=hematocrit.
8
Hb=Hemoglobin

Table 14. P2, Corticosterone and HSP70 levels of broiler chickens depopulated using VSDH, VSDHRh, or VSDCO2 using the average TOD from P1 to evaluate changes.

Treatment1 Sequence2 0 25 50 75 100 SEM P-value
VSDH Corticosterone (ng/mL) 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.27 0.19 0.06 0.82
HSP70 (CT1) 0.84 0.89 0.86 0.99 1.16 0.06 0.06
VSDHRh Corticosterone (ng/mL) 0.18 0.14 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.05 0.20
HSP70 (CT1) 0.88 0.95 0.86 1.07 1.06 0.06 0.12
VSDCO2 Corticosterone (ng/mL) 0.17 0.20 0.24 0.23 0.20 0.06 0.57
HSP70 (CT1) 1.10 0.67 0.87 0.79 0.88 0.13 0.32
P2=Phase 2, which was used to determine the physiological aspects of the three treatments over time by examining the corticosterone, gene expression, and blood chemistry.
1
VSDH = ventilation shutdown plus heat.
2
Sequence is Baseline = 0, 25 is 25 % to TOD, 50 is 50 % to TOD, 75 is 75 % to TOD, and 100 is TOD.

Conclusions and applications

  • 1.
    There were no significant differences between conscious and unconscious behaviors at the lower or upper EEG ranges. However, around the midway point of each treatment there was a noticeable shift toward unconscious behaviors.
  • 2.
    In the VSDCO2 treatment, the influence of a high CO2 environment appeared to influence the pH, pCO2, and pO2 more than in the VSDH or VSDHRh treatments.
  • 3.
    The results from P2 appear to indicate similarity among these methods as effective broiler flock depopulation methods with respect to their effects on each parameter measured over time.
  • 4.
    Based on the results above, VSDHRh may be a viable alternative method for broiler depopulation considering how similar it is to VSDH. However, it did have reduced HSP70 levels compared to VSDH, but more research needs to be conducted to fully understand how this treatment works in a non-environmentally controlled setting.

Source: Science Direct